Friday, November 6, 2015

טיול חלוצים Chalutzim

So, on Tuesday we travelled to Kfar Tavor and the Kinneret to learn about the Chalutzim coming to Eretz Yisrael. The Chalutzim were the pioneers who came to cultivate and work the land of Israel in order to later settle it as a nation.  There were two main waves of Aliyah which ranged from 1881-1903 and 1904-1914.
              The Aliyah Rishona was the first wave of Once to Israel (60,000), in itself there were two types of Chalutzim in this movement. The “Yeshuv Yeshan” and the “Yeshuv Chadash”. The old seat were the Jews who came to the four holy cities to study Torah, they had a rather poor lifestyle because they lived off of a fund send from other countries and didn’t work. They were the über religious Jews thoroughly devout in their studies there. Whereas the new seat weren’t necessarily religious nor did they focus on it. They wanted a new life in which they’d work and make a connection with the land (Labour Zionism). They worked as a community in Moshavs however unlike the second Aliyah, they worked for their own profit. A “Productive Jewish Society” was the start of a new revolution for these pioneers.            Despite how promising this idea was, there were still many challenges at hand for the Chalutzim. First of all the land that they bought was much less than appealing than promised, often times it was actually swampland which wasn’t 
farm-able in addition there was also disease present there. One major problem was their financial cr which made them reliant on Baron Rothschild despite their desired independence. He even sent clerks over and ran everything from afar to not lose any further money much to the protest of the Chalutzim. Other than that, the Jews had problems with the local (Arab) neighbors and the Turkish governmen
            The second Aliyah criticized the first because of two main things; lack of independence and outsourcing labour. That being said we can tell clear differences between the two. The second Aliyah was first of all more successful than the first but also this time there were a good number of determined, young, labour capable people (3,000 out of 33,000). There were three main causes for the second Aliyah which were the Kishinev pogroms, failed socialist revolution in Russian, and the Uganda proposal. Yosef Vitkin wrote an outcry to appeal to the young Jews to come and make Aliyah after the failed Socialist revolution. The second wave of Chalutzim wanted to rebuild and cultivate the land, they were also quite into having a socialist situation so they made small communities (or groups) with their friends called kibbutzim. They believed everything should be communal and that Hebrew should be the spoken language for the new nation.
            I thought that for the people to move to a completely different country and to risk so much was quite brave and I admire how they were able to do so. I think they could’ve done better in some aspects but given their situation I think they handled everything more than okay and pretty well actually. I think that what the Chalutzim did and envisioned was admirable and I give props to them for what they created however past that I don’t have much to say.
            The cemetery of Kinneret to me presents the memories and experiences from k’vutza Kinneret and that envelops both the hopes and despairs of the Chalutzim there. For instance the grave for Lotus was signifying a despair at the loss of the first child of the kibbutz. On the other hand it shows the inspiring and hope providing tales of some certain individuals like Rachel for example. I believe that the cemetery signifies both sides of this equally and that these, like two sides of a coin these memories make up and show the character of Kinneret.
            So, after a long day of learning and travel, what do you think you’d have done in the position of the Chalutzim? And which form of Zionist do you most agree with in terms of the Chalutzim? -Seth Crandus   

15 comments:

  1. I dont want to brand myself as a particular Zionist. I think we need the land for the religion, but also need Jewish culture to thrive. I also think that working the land is important, making it our own Jewish land. If I was one of the Chalutzim I think I would embrace Kibbutz life, so I could have a hard-working group of people together.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I definitely agree with lissie in that I have parts from many different zionists movements. I particularly like cultural and labor Zionism because I think the idea that Jews needed to stop relying on other people and work their own land and provide for themselves was extremely important but I also think an aspect of culture is essential in forming any community.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The chalutzim should be acknowledged and praised for what they accomplished and surviving in a nearly impossible situation. The stream that I relate to the most is the labor zionist movement, because I believe that the desire to come and work the land is a really noble goal. As I fall more in love with this country, I can see myself wanting to come back and do something that will physically improve the land of Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that the Chalutzim were extremely brave in coming to a new land and trying to bring life there. I agree with Jacob in that I mostly relate to the labor Zionist movement. It wouldn’t feel right for me to come to Israel and not do something physical in order to help. After Gadna, I am seriously considering making Aliyah and joining צהל, in order to work and physically do everything I can to make Israel better.

    -Rachael Coleman

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think that the chalutzim should be looked up to and acknowledged for the rest of history for their bravery and dedication towards Israel. Their zionistic comminitment was inspiring and should be what every Jew should strive for. Obviously the term "Zionist" isn flexible and has many different meaning and ways of showing it, but the Chalutzim showed the very epitome of the idea of Zionism. I admire them for their adoration and unconditional love for Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe that the people from chalutzim are some of the most courageous people from their time. To endure through so much and to leave everything behind just to establish a small farming community in Israel is mind boggling. I think this form of zionism is the best because with working the land we can own it and live sadly in our own homes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In my opinion, the Chalutzim were such a courageous and important group to the state of Israel. Even though there are many forms of Zionism, the Chalutzim carried out the meaning of Zionism in everything that they did. They are an important model for Zionism today and should always be remembered for their complete bravery and commitment to the state of Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think that the Chalutzim were very brave to leave everything that they knew to settle the land of Israel and create successful communities. I feel that I wouldn't belong to one Zionist group but I think that connecting to the land through labor Zionism is important but having a cultural background is also important.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In general I do not like the way that kibbutzim work. However, if I was going to a different country, without family or friends close by to lean on, I think that that type of dependent community would be very important. I would ave probably joined a kibbutz. I would probably have been a labor zionist because I never found a lot of connection through services and I think that making sure that there are plenty of Jews in all areas of the social pyramid is essential to creating an individual dependent Jewish society.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Similar to the saying about how "with no flour, there is no Torah", it was important for there to be Labor Zionists working the land in Israel. Religion is important to me, but if there is no way to live a life where we can survive and thrive, how can we get the chance to pray and study Torah. If I were to be in one of the Chalutzim groups, I would probably be Labor Zionist but also a practicing Jew at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It would be nice to think that if I were in the position of the chalutzim I would have continued despite all challenges, but in all likelihood, after too many trials I would probably end up going home. My national ideology is much weaker than my moral ideology. However, if I were called to join a brand of zionism while in Europe, I would most likely align myself with cultural zionism. I like the idea of a state that is Jewish, rather than a Jewish state, and building it from the ground up rather than establishing a nation to be Jewish in the first place. Creating a cultural center that radiates to the rest of the Jewish world would not only strengthen civilization, but also simplify national politics.

    -Noah Arnold

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't think I have the strength the chalutzim had. My parents always say I have no motivation, and because of that, there would be no way I could carry out the jobs the chalutzim did. I would give up, but because I can't deal with the shame of people seeing me fail, I would just probably kill myself. I personally don't think I belong to any specific type of zionism. All I know is that while I agree with the main principles of political zionism, I don't agree with the idea of anywhere was better than Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If I were in the position of the Chalutzim I think I wouldn't have the strength to go through with such a big goal. I think that with the almost un-farmable land I would've given up and moved back home. I like the social zionists because I like the idea of a cultural that is a majority jewish. I love being around judaism and strengthening my jewish identity every day.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Although it is impossible to know what I would have done, I would like to think that in the position of the chalutzim I would have given my best efforts to settle the land and establish a community. As a strong believer in hard work, I would hope that I would have persevered and given my all to the realization of my ideal.
    While we didn't focus much on them today, I identify with the cultural zionists. While I think that religion is important, it does not speak to all people. Through culture, Judaism can remain alive in a modern world. I also agree with the cultural zionists' ideas of organized leadership when settling, not just having random people come and try their best to make it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I do not know what branch, specifically, of Zionism that I would categorize myself in to; however, I do know that if I were in the position of the חלוצים, I would try to go to Israel and work the land so that the future generations will have a place to claim and live on. I would be a part of the base of civilization there so more may come and live, or even help.

    ReplyDelete